[Pyrex] Pyrex and the GIL

[Andrew Bennetts]

On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:22:59PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
[...]
> Hmmm. Maybe the three cases could be
> 
>    gil           # requires GIL held, default
>    nogil         # requires GIL released
>    gil or nogil  # doesn't care

That's reasonably clear.

> >How about:
> >
> >    @ensures_gil
> >    cdef int frobnicate(int result):
> 
> Urg! I was hoping to be able to keep the decorator syntax
> out of Pyrex. I suppose inevitably someone is going to want
> it... :-(

I winked for a reason.  You can relax, at least for now :)

-Andrew.