[Pyrex] More on enums in 0.9.5.1a

[Lenard Lindstrom]

Greg Ewing wrote:
> Eric Huss wrote:
>
>   
>> i = e + 1		# Fails.
>>     
>
> Hmmm, it seems you're right, C++ allows this without
> warning, although it doesn't seem very useful. It
> would be more useful IMO to allow
>
>    e = e + 1
>
> but that isn't allowed because the result is of type
> int instead of enum.
>   

That wouldn't be allowed because (e + 1) could be an invalid value for
the enum.

-- 
Lenard Lindstrom
<len-l at telus.net>