[Pyrex] [Cython-dev] Test case for Pyrex and Cython

[Jim Kleckner]

Greg Ewing wrote:
> Jim Kleckner wrote:
>> This could be done either by Pyrex permitting naming
>> of the form package/module.pyx (instead of requiring
>> the form package/package.module.pyx)
> 
> That can just be package.module.pyx -- it doesn't need
> to be in a subdirectory as well.

To minimize confusion of other readers of the list,
it was stated earlier in the thread that Pyrex works
with fully-qualified file names.  This suggestion is
in the context of how to obtain better Pyrex and Cython
compatibility.  Adding this form permits testing of
both without rework of file layout and has the added
benefit that David pointed out of being consistent with
other languages (and somewhat less redundant).