<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=us-ascii" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Greg Ewing wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid46B2C772.1060003@canterbury.ac.nz" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Billy G. Allie wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">It's independent. What I did was modified the Python 2.4.x distutils to
add the pyrex support, then created created diffs of the changes.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Is your version upward-compatible with the existing
Pyrex distutils extension? Could I just drop it in
and have people's existing setup.py files continue
to work?
--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Pyrex mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Pyrex@lists.copyleft.no">Pyrex@lists.copyleft.no</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/pyrex">http://lists.copyleft.no/mailman/listinfo/pyrex</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
Yes. To be sure, I ran a build with the Pryex include files (.pxd) in
the same directory as the Pyrex source files (which is where the
previous build_ext required them to be) and it built correctly.<br>
</body>
</html>